On "The Passion of the Christ" [per Wikipedia]:
Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It's not a secret, OK? And I'm not afraid to say it. That's why they hate this movie. It's about Jesus Christ, and it's about truth. It's about the Messiah.On sex:
Sexual libertines, from the Marquis de Sade to radical gay activists, have sought to pervert society by acting out on their own perversions. What motivates them most of all is a pathological hatred of Christianity. They know, deep down, that what they are doing is wrong, and they shudder at the dreaded words, "Thou Shalt Not." But they continue with their death-style anyway.
Secular saboteurs have often seized the arts to make a statement. That's why the blasphemous often tracks the obscene: if the goal is to put an artistic dagger into the heart of culture, then it makes sense to use all the ammo available by attacking the sacred. And they are certainly masters of that art. From scatological artistic exhibitions to the latest obscene installation, the charlatans have succeeded in politicizing the arts and denigrating Christianity.
On pedophiles, Ratzinger, and the Catholic church:
when Ratzinger's subordinates recommended therapy for Hullermann, he approved it. That was the drill of the day: after being treated, the patient (I prefer the term offender) returns to work. It's still the drill of the day in many secular quarters today, particularly in the public schools. A more hard-line approach, obviously, makes more sense, but the therapeutic industry is very powerful.
(This is the conservative synthesis in full bloom -- the instinctive leap from purification to violence is very Jack-D-Ripperian. Pass me the grain alcohol and rainwater!)
PS has anyone seen the South Park episode that mentions Donohue?
UPDATE Gawker (via Awl) explains what Donohue meant when he said that the church had a "homosexuality problem, not a pedophilia problem":
See, if the kids were post-pubescent—12 or 13, according to Bill—then it's not pedophilia anymore, it is homosexuality. And that means it's not the fault of the church, it is the fault of Gays.
A slightly more "moderate"-sounding version of this argument emanates from Ross Douthat. I consider my initial question largely answered.
5 comments:
I'm not a fan of Abe Foxman, but this guy is WAAAAAAY loopier than Abe Foxman.
The "on sex" link goes to . . . The Washington Post? What the hell is an unhinged, paranoid rant like that doing in a respectable media organization?
[Half-formed joke about legal topic of "Ripperian Rights."]
Yeah I guess I'm defaming Foxman (oops!) with the comparison. The parallel came to mind because they've got very similar day jobs on paper. The difference is that Foxman more or less sticks to his day job.
Btw Wikipedia quotes him saying Ratzingergate is "a homosexual scandal, not a pedophilia scandal"
Is he saying the Pope is gay? Isn't that like a logical impossibility?
No worse than the pope being straight I think... maybe he just thinks the scandal is a really gay scandal; this is reasonable as the scandal has mostly _touched_ men though some of them have also been boys. But I feel like "scandal" is feminine... I'm at a loss.
Post a Comment